On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 10:13:57PM +0100, Tobias Waldekranz wrote:
> +static int mv88e6xxx_vtu_get(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip, u16 vid,
> +                          struct mv88e6xxx_vtu_entry *entry)
>  {
> +     int err;
> +
>       if (!chip->info->ops->vtu_getnext)
>               return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>  
> -     return chip->info->ops->vtu_getnext(chip, entry);
> +     entry->vid = vid - 1;

Should the vtu_get API not work with vid 0 as well? Shouldn't we
initialize entry->vid to mv88e6xxx_max_vid(chip) in that case?

> +     entry->valid = false;
> +
> +     err = chip->info->ops->vtu_getnext(chip, entry);
> +
> +     if (entry->vid != vid)
> +             entry->valid = false;
> +
> +     return err;
>  }

Reply via email to