Hello Steen, On 15-03-21, 16:04, Steen Hegelund wrote: > Hi Kishon, Vinod, Andrew, Jacub, and David, > > I just wanted to know if you think that the Generic PHY subsystem might > not be the right place for this Ethernet SerDes PHY driver after all. > > Originally I chose this subsystem for historic reasons: The > Microchip/Microsemi Ocelot SerDes driver was added here when it was > upstreamed. > On the other hand the Ocelot Serdes can do both PCIe and Ethernet, so > it might fit the signature of a generic PHY better. > > At the moment the acceptance of the Sparx5 Serdes driver is blocking us > from adding the Sparx5 SwitchDev driver (to net), so it is really > important for us to resolve which subsystem the Serdes driver belongs > to. > > I am very much looking forward to your response.
Generic PHY IMO is the right place for this series, I shall review it shortly and do the needful. I have asked Kishon to check the new phy API and ack it... Thanks -- ~Vinod
