Hi Marc,
> Il 01/03/2021 12:38 Marc Kleine-Budde <m...@pengutronix.de> ha scritto:
>
>
> On 28.02.2021 11:38:54, Dario Binacchi wrote:
> [...]
>
> > @@ -730,7 +728,7 @@ static void c_can_do_tx(struct net_device *dev)
> > while ((idx = ffs(pend))) {
> > idx--;
> > pend &= ~(1 << idx);
> > - obj = idx + C_CAN_MSG_OBJ_TX_FIRST;
> > + obj = idx + priv->msg_obj_tx_first;
> > c_can_inval_tx_object(dev, IF_TX, obj);
> > can_get_echo_skb(dev, idx, NULL);
> > bytes += priv->dlc[idx];
> > @@ -740,7 +738,7 @@ static void c_can_do_tx(struct net_device *dev)
> > /* Clear the bits in the tx_active mask */
> > atomic_sub(clr, &priv->tx_active);
> >
> > - if (clr & (1 << (C_CAN_MSG_OBJ_TX_NUM - 1)))
> > + if (clr & (1 << (priv->msg_obj_tx_num - 1)))
>
> Do we need 1UL here, too?
Do you agree if I use the BIT macro ?
Thanks and regards
Dario
>
> Marc
>
> --
> Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde |
> Embedded Linux | https://www.pengutronix.de |
> Vertretung West/Dortmund | Phone: +49-231-2826-924 |
> Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
