El jue, 25 feb 2021 a las 21:05, Heiner Kallweit
(<hkallwe...@gmail.com>) escribió:
>
> On 25.02.2021 17:36, Daniel González Cabanelas wrote:
> > El jue, 25 feb 2021 a las 8:22, Heiner Kallweit
> > (<hkallwe...@gmail.com>) escribió:
> >>
> >> On 25.02.2021 00:54, Daniel González Cabanelas wrote:
> >>> El mié, 24 feb 2021 a las 23:01, Florian Fainelli
> >>> (<f.faine...@gmail.com>) escribió:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On 2/24/2021 1:44 PM, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
> >>>>> On 24.02.2021 16:44, Daniel González Cabanelas wrote:
> >>>>>> The current bcm63xx_enet driver doesn't asign the internal phy IRQ. As
> >>>>>> a
> >>>>>> result of this it works in polling mode.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Fix it using the phy_device structure to assign the platform IRQ.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Tested under a BCM6348 board. Kernel dmesg before the patch:
> >>>>>> Broadcom BCM63XX (1) bcm63xx_enet-0:01: attached PHY driver
> >>>>>> [Broadcom
> >>>>>> BCM63XX (1)] (mii_bus:phy_addr=bcm63xx_enet-0:01,
> >>>>>> irq=POLL)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> After the patch:
> >>>>>> Broadcom BCM63XX (1) bcm63xx_enet-0:01: attached PHY driver
> >>>>>> [Broadcom
> >>>>>> BCM63XX (1)] (mii_bus:phy_addr=bcm63xx_enet-0:01, irq=17)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Pluging and uplugging the ethernet cable now generates interrupts and
> >>>>>> the
> >>>>>> PHY goes up and down as expected.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Daniel González Cabanelas <dgcb...@gmail.com>
> >>>>>> ---
> >>>>>> changes in V2:
> >>>>>> - snippet moved after the mdiobus registration
> >>>>>> - added missing brackets
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bcm63xx_enet.c | 13 +++++++++++--
> >>>>>> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bcm63xx_enet.c
> >>>>>> b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bcm63xx_enet.c
> >>>>>> index fd876721316..dd218722560 100644
> >>>>>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bcm63xx_enet.c
> >>>>>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bcm63xx_enet.c
> >>>>>> @@ -1818,10 +1818,19 @@ static int bcm_enet_probe(struct
> >>>>>> platform_device *pdev)
> >>>>>> * if a slave is not present on hw */
> >>>>>> bus->phy_mask = ~(1 << priv->phy_id);
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> - if (priv->has_phy_interrupt)
> >>>>>> + ret = mdiobus_register(bus);
> >>>>>> +
> >>>>>> + if (priv->has_phy_interrupt) {
> >>>>>> + phydev = mdiobus_get_phy(bus, priv->phy_id);
> >>>>>> + if (!phydev) {
> >>>>>> + dev_err(&dev->dev, "no PHY found\n");
> >>>>>> + goto out_unregister_mdio;
> >>>>>> + }
> >>>>>> +
> >>>>>> bus->irq[priv->phy_id] = priv->phy_interrupt;
> >>>>>> + phydev->irq = priv->phy_interrupt;
> >>>>>> + }
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> - ret = mdiobus_register(bus);
> >>>>>
> >>>>> You shouldn't have to set phydev->irq, this is done by
> >>>>> phy_device_create().
> >>>>> For this to work bus->irq[] needs to be set before calling
> >>>>> mdiobus_register().
> >>>>
> >>>> Yes good point, and that is what the unchanged code does actually.
> >>>> Daniel, any idea why that is not working?
> >>>
> >>> Hi Florian, I don't know. bus->irq[] has no effect, only assigning the
> >>> IRQ through phydev->irq works.
> >>>
> >>> I can resend the patch without the bus->irq[] line since it's
> >>> pointless in this scenario.
> >>>
> >>
> >> It's still an ugly workaround and a proper root cause analysis should be
> >> done
> >> first. I can only imagine that phydev->irq is overwritten in phy_probe()
> >> because phy_drv_supports_irq() is false. Can you please check whether
> >> phydev->irq is properly set in phy_device_create(), and if yes, whether
> >> it's reset to PHY_POLL in phy_probe()?.
> >>
> >
> > Hi Heiner, I added some kernel prints:
> >
> > [ 2.712519] libphy: Fixed MDIO Bus: probed
> > [ 2.721969] =======phy_device_create===========
> > [ 2.726841] phy_device_create: dev->irq = 17
> > [ 2.726841]
> > [ 2.832620] =======phy_probe===========
> > [ 2.836846] phy_probe: phydev->irq = 17
> > [ 2.840950] phy_probe: phy_drv_supports_irq = 0, phy_interrupt_is_valid
> > = 1
> > [ 2.848267] phy_probe: phydev->irq = -1
> > [ 2.848267]
> > [ 2.854059] =======phy_probe===========
> > [ 2.858174] phy_probe: phydev->irq = -1
> > [ 2.862253] phy_probe: phydev->irq = -1
> > [ 2.862253]
> > [ 2.868121] libphy: bcm63xx_enet MII bus: probed
> > [ 2.873320] Broadcom BCM63XX (1) bcm63xx_enet-0:01: attached PHY
> > driver [Broadcom BCM63XX (1)] (mii_bus:phy_addr=bcm63xx_enet-0:01,
> > irq=POLL)
> >
> > Currently using kernel 5.4.99. I still have no idea what's going on.
> >
> Thanks for debugging. This confirms my assumption that the interrupt
> is overwritten in phy_probe(). I'm just scratching my head how
> phy_drv_supports_irq() can return 0. In 5.4.99 it's defined as:
>
> static bool phy_drv_supports_irq(struct phy_driver *phydrv)
> {
> return phydrv->config_intr && phydrv->ack_interrupt;
> }
>
> And that's the PHY driver:
>
> static struct phy_driver bcm63xx_driver[] = {
> {
> .phy_id = 0x00406000,
> .phy_id_mask = 0xfffffc00,
> .name = "Broadcom BCM63XX (1)",
> /* PHY_BASIC_FEATURES */
> .flags = PHY_IS_INTERNAL,
> .config_init = bcm63xx_config_init,
> .ack_interrupt = bcm_phy_ack_intr,
> .config_intr = bcm63xx_config_intr,
> }
>
> So both callbacks are set. Can you extend your debugging and check
> in phy_drv_supports_irq() which of the callbacks is missing?
>
Hi, both callbacks are missing on the first check. However on the next
calls they're there.
[ 2.263909] libphy: Fixed MDIO Bus: probed
[ 2.273026] =======phy_device_create===========
[ 2.277908] phy_device_create: dev->irq = 17
[ 2.277908]
[ 2.373104] =======phy_probe===========
[ 2.377336] phy_probe: phydev->irq = 17
[ 2.381445] phy_drv_supports_irq: phydrv->config_intr = 0,
phydrv->ack_interrupt = 0
[ 2.389554] phydev->irq = PHY_POLL;
[ 2.393186] phy_probe: phydev->irq = -1
[ 2.393186]
[ 2.398987] =======phy_probe===========
[ 2.403108] phy_probe: phydev->irq = -1
[ 2.407195] phy_drv_supports_irq: phydrv->config_intr = 1,
phydrv->ack_interrupt = 1
[ 2.415314] phy_probe: phydev->irq = -1
[ 2.415314]
[ 2.421189] libphy: bcm63xx_enet MII bus: probed
[ 2.426129] =======phy_connect===========
[ 2.430410] phy_drv_supports_irq: phydrv->config_intr = 1,
phydrv->ack_interrupt = 1
[ 2.438537] phy_connect: phy_drv_supports_irq = 1
[ 2.438537]
[ 2.445284] Broadcom BCM63XX (1) bcm63xx_enet-0:01: attached PHY
driver [Broadcom BCM63XX (1)] (mii_bus:phy_addr=bcm63xx_enet-0:01,
irq=POLL)
I also added the prints to phy_connect.
> Last but not least: Do you use a mainline kernel, or is it maybe
> a modified downstream kernel? In the latter case, please check
> in your kernel sources whether both callbacks are set.
>
It's a modified kernel, and the the callbacks are set. BTW I also
tested the kernel with no patches concerning to the ethernet driver.
Regards,
Daniel
>
>
> >> On which kernel version do you face this problem?
> >>
> > The kernel version 4.4 works ok. The minimum version where I found the
> > problem were the kernel 4.9.111, now using 5.4. And 5.10 also tested.
> >
> > Regards
> > Daniel
> >
> >>> Regards
> >>>> --
> >>>> Florian
> >>
>
