On Tue, 2021-02-23 at 21:15 -0500, Ian Denhardt wrote: > Per discussion at: > > https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/c964892195a6b91d20a67691448567ef528ffa6d.ca...@linux.ibm.com/T/#t > > ...this was originally introduced as a warning due to concerns about > breaking existing code, but a hard error probably makes more sense, > especially given that concerns about breakage were only speculation. > --- > tools/bpf/bpf_exp.y | 6 ++++-- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpf_exp.y b/tools/bpf/bpf_exp.y > index 8d48e896be50..8d03e5245da5 100644 > --- a/tools/bpf/bpf_exp.y > +++ b/tools/bpf/bpf_exp.y > @@ -549,9 +549,11 @@ static uint8_t bpf_encode_jt_jf_offset(int off, > int i) > { > int delta = off - i - 1; > > - if (delta < 0 || delta > 255) > - fprintf(stderr, "warning: insn #%d jumps to insn #%d, " > + if (delta < 0 || delta > 255) { > + fprintf(stderr, "error: insn #%d jumps to insn #%d, " > "which is out of range\n", i, off); > + exit(1); > + } > return (uint8_t) delta; > } >
Acked-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <i...@linux.ibm.com>
