On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 8:08 PM Jakub Kicinski <k...@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 18 Feb 2021 13:30:53 +0100 Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> > The icmp{,v6}_send functions make all sorts of use of skb->cb, assuming
> > the skb to have come directly from the inet layer. But when the packet
> > comes from the ndo layer, especially when forwarded, there's no telling
> > what might be in skb->cb at that point. So, icmp{,v6}_ndo_send must zero
> > out its skb->cb before passing the packet off to icmp{,v6}_send.
> > Otherwise the icmp sending code risks reading bogus memory contents,
> > which can result in nasty stack overflows such as this one reported by a
> > user:
> >
> >     panic+0x108/0x2ea
> >     __stack_chk_fail+0x14/0x20
> >     __icmp_send+0x5bd/0x5c0
> >     icmp_ndo_send+0x148/0x160
> >
> > This is easy to simulate by doing a `memset(skb->cb, 0x41,
> > sizeof(skb->cb));` before calling icmp{,v6}_ndo_send, and it's only by
> > good fortune and the rarity of icmp sending from that context that we've
> > avoided reports like this until now. For example, in KASAN:
> >
> >     BUG: KASAN: stack-out-of-bounds in __ip_options_echo+0xa0e/0x12b0
> >     Write of size 38 at addr ffff888006f1f80e by task ping/89
> >     CPU: 2 PID: 89 Comm: ping Not tainted 5.10.0-rc7-debug+ #5
> >     Call Trace:
> >      dump_stack+0x9a/0xcc
> >      print_address_description.constprop.0+0x1a/0x160
> >      __kasan_report.cold+0x20/0x38
> >      kasan_report+0x32/0x40
> >      check_memory_region+0x145/0x1a0
> >      memcpy+0x39/0x60
> >      __ip_options_echo+0xa0e/0x12b0
> >      __icmp_send+0x744/0x1700
> >
> > Actually, out of the 4 drivers that do this, only gtp zeroed the cb for
> > the v4 case, while the rest did not. So this commit actually removes the
> > gtp-specific zeroing, while putting the code where it belongs in the
> > shared infrastructure of icmp{,v6}_ndo_send.
> >
> > Fixes: a2b78e9b2cac ("sunvnet: generate ICMP PTMUD messages for smaller 
> > port MTUs")
>
> nit: please make sure you CC the authors of the commits you're blaming.

Will do. Though in this case, it's behavior that's a few places, so I
put the git commit of the earliest case, to aid with backporting.

(This email is a reply to v1, but please check out v2.)

Jason

Reply via email to