On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 03:57:13PM -0700, Kok, Auke wrote:
> 
> Hmm, we're making a mess of it.

Indeed :)

> Herbert, wouldn't it just have been a lot easier to do just add a 
> netif_poll_disable in e1000_probe, so that any and all other poll 
> enable/disables are symmetric ? Something like this?

I wish if it were as simple as that.  As soon as register_netdev
returns somebody else can invoke e1000_open so disabling poll
here can be undesirable.  In fact the existing netif_stop_queue
and netif_carrier_off calls are also bad for the same reason.

I'll keep looking to see if there's some other problem that we
haven't uncovered yet.

Cheers,
-- 
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to