On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 04:16:27PM +0100, Marek Behun wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Feb 2021 14:57:57 +0000
> Russell King - ARM Linux admin <li...@armlinux.org.uk> wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 02:47:56PM +0100, Marek Behun wrote:
> > > On Mon, 15 Feb 2021 06:15:59 +0000
> > > Nathan Rossi <nat...@nathanrossi.com> wrote:
> > >   
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c 
> > > > b/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c
> > > > index 54aa942eed..5c52906b29 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c
> > > > @@ -650,6 +650,13 @@ static void mv88e6xxx_validate(struct dsa_switch 
> > > > *ds, int port,
> > > >         if (chip->info->ops->phylink_validate)
> > > >                 chip->info->ops->phylink_validate(chip, port, mask, 
> > > > state);
> > > >  
> > > > +       /* Advertise 2500BASEX only if 1000BASEX is not configured, this
> > > > +        * prevents phylink_helper_basex_speed from always overriding 
> > > > the
> > > > +        * 1000BASEX mode since auto negotiation is always enabled.
> > > > +        */
> > > > +       if (state->interface == PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_1000BASEX)
> > > > +               phylink_clear(mask, 2500baseX_Full);
> > > > +  
> > > 
> > > I don't quite like this. This problem should be either solved in
> > > phylink_helper_basex_speed() or somewhere in the mv88e6xxx code, but near
> > > the call to phylink_helper_basex_speed().
> > > 
> > > Putting a solution to the behaviour of phylink_helper_basex_speed() it
> > > into the validate() method when phylink_helper_basex_speed() is called
> > > from a different place will complicate debugging in the future. If
> > > we start solving problems in this kind of way, the driver will become
> > > totally unreadable, IMO.  
> > 
> > If we can't switch between 1000base-X and 2500base-X, then we should
> > not be calling phylink_helper_basex_speed() - and only one of those
> > two capabilities should be set in the validation callback. I thought
> > there were DSA switches where we could program the CMODE to switch
> > between these two...
> 
> There are. At least Peridot, Topaz and Amethyst support switching
> between these modes. But only on some ports.
> 
> This problem happnes on Peridot X, I think.
> 
> On Peridot X there are
> - port 0: RGMII
> - ports 9-10: capable of 1, 2.5 and 10G SerDes (10G via
>   XAUI/RXAUI, so multiple lanes)
> - ports 1-8: with copper PHYs
>   - some of these can instead be set to use the unused SerDes lanes
>     of ports 9-10, but only in 1000base-x mode
> 
> So the problem can happen if you set port 9 or 10 to only use one
> SerDes lane, and use the spare lanes for the 1G ports.
> On these ports 2500base-x is not supported, only 1000base-x (maybe
> sgmii, I don't remember)

It sounds like the modes are not reporting correctly then before calling
phylink_helper_basex_speed(). If the port can only be used at 1000base-X,
then it should not be allowing 2500base-X to be set prior to calling
phylink_helper_basex_speed().

-- 
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 40Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!

Reply via email to