Hi Bryan, On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 3:45 PM <bryan.whiteh...@microchip.com> wrote: > > According to the document I have, FRAME_LENGTH is only valid when LS bit is > set, and reserved otherwise. > Therefore, I'm not sure you can rely on it being zero when LS is not set, > even if your experiments say it is. > Future chip revisions might use those bits differently.
That's good to know. I didn't find any documentation related to multi-buffer frames, so I had to go with what I saw the chip do experimentally. It's great that you were able to double-check against the official docs. > > Can you change this so the LS bit is checked. > If set you can use the smaller of FRAME_LENGTH or buffer length. > If clear you can just use buffer length. Will do. Are you planning to hold off your tests until v3? It shouldn't take too long.
