> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 12:48:52PM +0200, stef...@marvell.com wrote:
> > From: Stefan Chulski <stef...@marvell.com>
> >
> > This patch add PPv23 version definition.
> > PPv23 is new packet processor in CP115.
> > Everything that supported by PPv22, also supported by PPv23.
> > No functional changes in this stage.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Stefan Chulski <stef...@marvell.com>
> > Acked-by: Marcin Wojtas <m...@semihalf.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Russell King <rmk+ker...@armlinux.org.uk>
>
> > @@ -7049,6 +7049,11 @@ static int mvpp2_probe(struct platform_device
> *pdev)
> > priv->port_map |= BIT(i);
> > }
> >
> > + if (priv->hw_version != MVPP21) {
> > + if (mvpp2_read(priv, MVPP2_VER_ID_REG) ==
> MVPP2_VER_PP23)
> > + priv->hw_version = MVPP23;
> > + }
> > +
>
> The only minor comment I have on this is... the formatting of the above.
> Wouldn't:
>
> if (priv->hw_version >= MVPP22 &&
> mvpp2_read(priv, MVPP2_VER_ID_REG) == MVPP2_VER_PP23)
> priv->hw_version = MVPP23;
>
> read better?
>
> Do we need to even check priv->hw_version here? Isn't this register
> implemented in PPv2.1 where it contains the value zero?
Yes, we can just:
if (mvpp2_read(priv, MVPP2_VER_ID_REG) == MVPP2_VER_PP23)
priv->hw_version = MVPP23;
Thanks,
Stefan.
