Hi Vinod, On Thu, 2021-02-04 at 13:31 +0530, Vinod Koul wrote: > EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you > know the content is safe > > On 29-01-21, 14:07, Steen Hegelund wrote: > > Add the Microchip Sparx5 ethernet serdes PHY driver for the 6G, 10G > > and 25G > > interfaces available in the Sparx5 SoC. > > > > Signed-off-by: Bjarni Jonasson <bjarni.jonas...@microchip.com> > > Signed-off-by: Steen Hegelund <steen.hegel...@microchip.com> > > Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <and...@lunn.ch> > > Reviewed-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.bell...@bootlin.com> > > --- > >
... > > sdx5_rmw(SD25G_LANE_LANE_1E_LN_CFG_RXLB_EN_SET(params- > > >cfg_rxlb_en), > > + SD25G_LANE_LANE_1E_LN_CFG_RXLB_EN, > > + priv, > > + SD25G_LANE_LANE_1E(sd_index)); > > + > > + sdx5_rmw(SD25G_LANE_LANE_19_LN_CFG_TXLB_EN_SET(params- > > >cfg_txlb_en), > > + SD25G_LANE_LANE_19_LN_CFG_TXLB_EN, > > + priv, > > + SD25G_LANE_LANE_19(sd_index)); > > + > > + sdx5_rmw(SD25G_LANE_LANE_2E_LN_CFG_RSTN_DFEDIG_SET(0), > > + SD25G_LANE_LANE_2E_LN_CFG_RSTN_DFEDIG, > > + priv, > > + SD25G_LANE_LANE_2E(sd_index)); > > + > > + sdx5_rmw(SD25G_LANE_LANE_2E_LN_CFG_RSTN_DFEDIG_SET(1), > > + SD25G_LANE_LANE_2E_LN_CFG_RSTN_DFEDIG, > > + priv, > > + SD25G_LANE_LANE_2E(sd_index)); > > + > > + sdx5_rmw(SD_LANE_25G_SD_LANE_CFG_MACRO_RST_SET(0), > > + SD_LANE_25G_SD_LANE_CFG_MACRO_RST, > > + priv, > > + SD_LANE_25G_SD_LANE_CFG(sd_index)); > > + > > + sdx5_rmw(SD25G_LANE_LANE_1C_LN_CFG_CDR_RSTN_SET(0), > > + SD25G_LANE_LANE_1C_LN_CFG_CDR_RSTN, > > + priv, > > + SD25G_LANE_LANE_1C(sd_index)); > > This looks quite terrible :( > > Can we do a table here for these and then write the configuration > table, > that may look better and easy to maintain ? I will restructure this. > > > + > > + usleep_range(1000, 2000); > > + > > + sdx5_rmw(SD25G_LANE_LANE_1C_LN_CFG_CDR_RSTN_SET(1), > > + SD25G_LANE_LANE_1C_LN_CFG_CDR_RSTN, > > + priv, > > + SD25G_LANE_LANE_1C(sd_index)); > > + > > + usleep_range(10000, 20000); > > + > > + sdx5_rmw(SD25G_LANE_CMU_FF_REGISTER_TABLE_INDEX_SET(0xff), > > + SD25G_LANE_CMU_FF_REGISTER_TABLE_INDEX, > > + priv, > > + SD25G_LANE_CMU_FF(sd_index)); > > + > > + value = sdx5_rd(priv, SD25G_LANE_CMU_C0(sd_index)); > > + value = SD25G_LANE_CMU_C0_PLL_LOL_UDL_GET(value); > > + > > + if (value) { > > + dev_err(macro->priv->dev, "25G PLL Loss of Lock: > > 0x%x\n", value); > > + ret = -EINVAL; > > + } > > + > > + value = sdx5_rd(priv, SD_LANE_25G_SD_LANE_STAT(sd_index)); > > + value = SD_LANE_25G_SD_LANE_STAT_PMA_RST_DONE_GET(value); > > + > > + if (value != 0x1) { > > + dev_err(macro->priv->dev, "25G PMA Reset failed: > > 0x%x\n", value); > > + ret = -EINVAL; > > continue on error..? I will change that. > > > + } > > + > > + sdx5_rmw(SD25G_LANE_CMU_2A_R_DBG_LOL_STATUS_SET(0x1), > > + SD25G_LANE_CMU_2A_R_DBG_LOL_STATUS, > > + priv, > > + SD25G_LANE_CMU_2A(sd_index)); > > + > > + sdx5_rmw(SD_LANE_25G_SD_SER_RST_SER_RST_SET(0x0), > > + SD_LANE_25G_SD_SER_RST_SER_RST, > > + priv, > > ... > > sdx5_inst_rmw(SD10G_LANE_LANE_0E_CFG_RXLB_EN_SET(params- > > >cfg_rxlb_en) | > > + SD10G_LANE_LANE_0E_CFG_TXLB_EN_SET(params- > > >cfg_txlb_en), > > + SD10G_LANE_LANE_0E_CFG_RXLB_EN | > > + SD10G_LANE_LANE_0E_CFG_TXLB_EN, > > + sd_inst, > > + SD10G_LANE_LANE_0E(sd_index)); > > + > > + sdx5_rmw(SD_LANE_SD_LANE_CFG_MACRO_RST_SET(0), > > + SD_LANE_SD_LANE_CFG_MACRO_RST, > > + priv, > > + SD_LANE_SD_LANE_CFG(sd_lane_tgt)); > > + > > + sdx5_inst_rmw(SD10G_LANE_LANE_50_CFG_SSC_RESETB_SET(1), > > + SD10G_LANE_LANE_50_CFG_SSC_RESETB, > > + sd_inst, > > + SD10G_LANE_LANE_50(sd_index)); > > + > > + sdx5_rmw(SD10G_LANE_LANE_50_CFG_SSC_RESETB_SET(1), > > + SD10G_LANE_LANE_50_CFG_SSC_RESETB, > > + priv, > > + SD10G_LANE_LANE_50(sd_index)); > > + > > + sdx5_rmw(SD_LANE_MISC_SD_125_RST_DIS_SET(params->fx_100), > > + SD_LANE_MISC_SD_125_RST_DIS, > > + priv, > > + SD_LANE_MISC(sd_lane_tgt)); > > + > > + sdx5_rmw(SD_LANE_MISC_RX_ENA_SET(params->fx_100), > > + SD_LANE_MISC_RX_ENA, > > + priv, > > + SD_LANE_MISC(sd_lane_tgt)); > > + > > + sdx5_rmw(SD_LANE_MISC_MUX_ENA_SET(params->fx_100), > > + SD_LANE_MISC_MUX_ENA, > > + priv, > > + SD_LANE_MISC(sd_lane_tgt)); > > Table for this set as well as other places please I will restructure the code here as well. > > -- > ~Vinod Thank you for your comments. BR Steen