On Fri, May 25, 2007 at 09:15:17AM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote: > > I am very glad you fixed /proc/net/tcp, but I would like to > understand why this cond_resched_softirq() even exist.
Well presumably it lets other threads have a chance to run in a BH-disabled section. > Its name and behavior dont match at all. But yes it probably makes sense for it to process some softirq work as well. Ingo? Cheers, -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
