On Fri, 05 Feb 2021 08:47:38 +0100 Sven Eckelmann wrote: > On Thursday, 4 February 2021 20:58:36 CET Jakub Kicinski wrote: > > Back when I was working for a vendor I had a script which used git to > > find files touched in current year and then a bit of sed to update the > > dates. Instead of running your current script every Jan, you can run > > that one every Dec. > > Just as an additional anecdote: Just had the situation that a vendor > complained that the user visible copyright notice was still 2020 for a > project > published in 2021 but developed and tested 2020 (and thus tagged + packaged > in > 2020). > > Now to something more relevant: what do you think about dropping the > copyright > year [1]?
Interesting! In my own code I do option 1, copyright protection is longer than the code I write is relevant :S 3 seems to be what US lawyers like but frankly in the git era they are probably overly lazy^W cautious. Option 4 seems nice as well - it's really up to you(r lawyer).