On Wed, 3 Feb 2021 07:16:17 -0800 Randy Dunlap <rdun...@infradead.org> wrote:
> On 2/2/21 10:38 PM, samirweng1979 wrote: > > From: wengjianfeng <wengjianf...@yulong.com> > > > > remove duplicate word 'we' in comment > > > > Signed-off-by: wengjianfeng <wengjianf...@yulong.com> > > --- > > drivers/net/wireless/ralink/rt2x00/rt2x00crypto.c | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ralink/rt2x00/rt2x00crypto.c > > b/drivers/net/wireless/ralink/rt2x00/rt2x00crypto.c index > > c861811..7158152 100644 --- > > a/drivers/net/wireless/ralink/rt2x00/rt2x00crypto.c +++ > > b/drivers/net/wireless/ralink/rt2x00/rt2x00crypto.c @@ -179,7 > > +179,7 @@ void rt2x00crypto_rx_insert_iv(struct sk_buff *skb, > > * Make room for new data. There are 2 possibilities > > * either the alignment is already present between > > * the 802.11 header and payload. In that case we > > - * we have to move the header less then the iv_len > > + * have to move the header less then the iv_len > > s/then/than/ > > > * since we can use the already available l2pad bytes > > * for the iv data. > > * When the alignment must be added manually we must > > > > Hi Randy, So you means add it for byte alignment, right? if yes,just ignore the patch. thanks.
