On Tue, May 22, 2007 at 10:05:00AM -0000, Samuel Ortiz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > On 5/22/2007, "Zhang Rui" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >Index: linux-2.6.22-rc1/include/linux/netlink.h > >=================================================================== > >--- linux-2.6.22-rc1.orig/include/linux/netlink.h 2007-05-21 > >10:19:00.000000000 +0800 > >+++ linux-2.6.22-rc1/include/linux/netlink.h 2007-05-21 15:26:14.000000000 > >+0800 > >@@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ > > /* leave room for NETLINK_DM (DM Events) */ > > #define NETLINK_SCSITRANSPORT 18 /* SCSI Transports */ > > #define NETLINK_ECRYPTFS 19 > >+#define NETLINK_ACPI_EVENT 20 /* acpi event notifications */ > I think it is recommended to use the generic netlink layer instead of > having everyone adding its own netlink ID.
It is possible to allocate your own netlink protocol number, but Samuel is right, it is better to use existing delivery mechanisms like genetlink and connector. > Cheers, > Samuel. > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in > the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- Evgeniy Polyakov - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
