On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 8:56 PM David Ahern <dsah...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I'm not a fan of the skb trim idea. I think it would be better to figure
> out how to stop adding to the skb when an attr length is going to exceed
> 64kB. Not failing hard with an error (ip link sh needs to succeed), but
> truncating the specific attribute of a message with a flag so userspace
> knows it is short.

Absent the ability to do something useful in terms of actually
avoiding the overflow [1], I'm abandoning this approach entirely. I
have a different idea that I will propose in due course.

[1] https://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=161163943811663

Regards,
Edwin Peer

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Reply via email to