Hi Maciej,
On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 11:42:38PM +0100, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
> > +static int dev_map_bpf_prog_run(struct bpf_prog *xdp_prog,
> > +                           struct xdp_frame **frames, int n,
> > +                           struct net_device *dev)
> > +{
> > +   struct xdp_txq_info txq = { .dev = dev };
> > +   struct xdp_buff xdp;
> > +   int i, nframes = 0;
> > +
> > +   for (i = 0; i < n; i++) {
> > +           struct xdp_frame *xdpf = frames[i];
> > +           u32 act;
> > +           int err;
> > +
> > +           xdp_convert_frame_to_buff(xdpf, &xdp);
> > +           xdp.txq = &txq;
> > +
> > +           act = bpf_prog_run_xdp(xdp_prog, &xdp);
> > +           switch (act) {
> > +           case XDP_PASS:
> > +                   err = xdp_update_frame_from_buff(&xdp, xdpf);
> 
> Bump on John's question.

Hi Jesper, would you please help answer John's question?
> >  
> > -   sent = dev->netdev_ops->ndo_xdp_xmit(dev, bq->count, bq->q, flags);
> > +   /* Init sent to cnt in case there is no xdp_prog */
> > +   sent = cnt;
> > +   if (bq->xdp_prog) {
> > +           sent = dev_map_bpf_prog_run(bq->xdp_prog, bq->q, cnt, dev);
> > +           if (!sent)
> > +                   goto out;
> 
> Sorry, but 'sent' is a bit confusing to me, actual sending happens below
> via ndo_xdp_xmit, right? This hook will not actually send frames.
> Can we do a subtle change to have it in separate variable 'to_send' ?

Makes sense to me.
> 
> Although I'm a huge goto advocate, I feel like this particular usage could
> be simplified. Not sure why we had that in first place.
> 
> I gave a shot at rewriting/refactoring whole bq_xmit_all and I feel like
> it's more readable. I introduced 'to_send' variable and got rid of 'error'
> label.
> 
> Thoughts?
> 
> I might have missed something, though.
> 
> static void bq_xmit_all(struct xdp_dev_bulk_queue *bq, u32 flags)
> {
>       struct net_device *dev = bq->dev;
>       unsigned int cnt = bq->count;
>       int drops = 0, err = 0;
>       int to_send = 0;

The to_send also need to init to cnt.

>       int sent = cnt;
>       int i;
> 
>       if (unlikely(!cnt))
>               return;
> 
>       for (i = 0; i < cnt; i++) {
>               struct xdp_frame *xdpf = bq->q[i];
> 
>               prefetch(xdpf);
>       }
> 
>       if (bq->xdp_prog) {
>               to_send = dev_map_bpf_prog_run(bq->xdp_prog, bq->q, cnt, dev);
>               if (!to_send) {
>                       sent = 0;
>                       goto out;
>               }
>       }
> 
>       drops = cnt - to_send;

This line could move in to the xdp_prog brackets to save time when no xdp_prog.

        if (bq->xdp_prog) {
                to_send = ...
                if (!to_send) {
                        ...
                }
                drops = cnt - to_send;
        }

>       sent = dev->netdev_ops->ndo_xdp_xmit(dev, to_send, bq->q, flags);

If we don't have xdp_prog, the to_send should be cnt.

>       if (sent < 0) {
>               err = sent;
>               sent = 0;
> 
>               /* If ndo_xdp_xmit fails with an errno, no frames have been
>                * xmit'ed and it's our responsibility to them free all.
>                */
>               for (i = 0; i < cnt - drops; i++) {
>                       struct xdp_frame *xdpf = bq->q[i];
> 
>                       xdp_return_frame_rx_napi(xdpf);
>               }
>       }
> out:
>       drops = cnt - sent;
>       bq->count = 0;
> 
>       trace_xdp_devmap_xmit(bq->dev_rx, dev, sent, drops, err);
>       bq->dev_rx = NULL;
>       bq->xdp_prog = NULL;
>       __list_del_clearprev(&bq->flush_node);
> 
>       return;
> }

Thanks for your code, looks much clear now.

Hangbin

Reply via email to