On 1/21/21 2:31 AM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
On Wed, 20 Jan 2021 04:05:02 +0100 Marek Vasut wrote:
KSZ8794CNX datasheet section 8.0 RESET CIRCUIT describes recommended
circuit for interfacing with CPU/FPGA reset consisting of 10k pullup
resistor and 10uF capacitor to ground. This circuit takes ~100 ms to
rise enough to release the reset.

For maximum supply voltage VDDIO=3.3V VIH=2.0V R=10kR C=10uF that is
                     VDDIO - VIH
   t = R * C * -ln( ------------- ) = 10000*0.00001*-(-0.93)=0.093 s
                        VDDIO
so we need ~95 ms for the reset to really de-assert, and then the
original 100us for the switch itself to come out of reset. Simply
msleep() for 100 ms which fits the constraint with a bit of extra
space.

Fixes: 5b797980908a ("net: dsa: microchip: Implement recommended reset timing")
Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.faine...@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <ma...@denx.de>

I'm slightly confused whether this is just future proofing or you
actually have a board where this matters. The tree is tagged as
net-next but there is a Fixes tag which normally indicates net+stable.

I have a board where I trigger this problem, that's how I found it. It should be passed to stable too. So the correct tree / tag is "net" ?

Reply via email to