On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 15:46, Jakub Kicinski <k...@kernel.org> wrote: > On Sat, 16 Jan 2021 01:24:35 +0200 Vladimir Oltean wrote: >> On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 03:02:46PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote: >> > On Fri, 15 Jan 2021 13:52:57 +0100 Tobias Waldekranz wrote: >> > > The kernel test robot kindly pointed out that Global 2 support in >> > > mv88e6xxx is optional. >> > > >> > > This also made me realize that we should verify that the hardware >> > > actually supports LAG offloading before trying to configure it. >> > > >> > > v1 -> v2: >> > > - Do not allocate LAG ID mappings on unsupported hardware (Vladimir). >> > > - Simplify _has_lag predicate (Vladimir). >> > >> > If I'm reading the discussion on v1 right there will be a v3, >> > LMK if I got it wrong. >> >> I don't think a v3 was supposed to be coming, what made you think that? > > I thought you concluded that the entire CONFIG_NET_DSA_MV88E6XXX_GLOBAL2 > should go, you said: > >> So, roughly, you save 10%/13k. That hardly justifies the complexity IMO.
Well, based on what Andrew said, my guess is that that is where we will end up. But since at the moment net-next does not build for configs without Global2-support, I would really appreciate it if this series could be applied to solve that immediate problem.
