Jakub Kicinski [k...@kernel.org] wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Jan 2021 23:12:31 -0800 Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote:
> > The reset functions need just the 'reset reason' parameter and not
> > the ibmvnic_rwi list element. Update the functions so we can simplify
> > the handling of the ->rwi_list in a follow-on patch.
> >
> > Fixes: 2770a7984db5 ("ibmvnic: Introduce hard reset recovery")
> >
>
> No empty lines after Fixes tags, please. They should also not be
> wrapped.
Ah ok, will fix.
>
> > Signed-off-by: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <suka...@linux.ibm.com>
>
> Are these patches for net or net-next? It looks like they are fixing
> races, but at the same time they are rather large. Can you please
> produce minimal fixes, e.g. patch 3 should just fix the existing leaks
> rather than refactor the code to not do allocations. 130+ LoC is a lot
> for a fix.
This is a set of bug fixes, but yes a bit large. Should I submit to
net-next instead?
Thanks,
Sukadev
