On Fri, Jan 8, 2021 at 4:41 PM Eric Dumazet <eduma...@google.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 8, 2021 at 2:51 PM Sedat Dilek <sedat.di...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Fri, Jan 8, 2021 at 2:08 PM Sedat Dilek <sedat.di...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 6:25 PM Eric Dumazet <eduma...@google.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > Also, I tried the diff for tcp_conn_request... > > > > > With removing the call to prandom_u32() not useful for > > > > > prandom_u32/tracing via perf. > > > > > > > > I am planning to send the TCP patch once net-next is open. (probably > > > > next week) > > > > > > Ping. > > > > > > What is the status of this? > > > > > > > I am attaching the updated diff against latest Linus Git. > > > > - Sedat - > > I have decided to not pursue this. > > skb->hash might be populated by non random data if fed from a > problematic source/driver. > > Better to leave current code in place, there is no convincing argument > to change this.
OK, Thanks for the clarification. - Sedat -
