On Fri, 2021-01-08 at 10:27 +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote: > On Fri, Jan 8, 2021 at 10:21 AM Vladimir Oltean <olte...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 08, 2021 at 10:14:01AM +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote: > > > If you disagree, repost a rebased patch series so that we can > > > test/compare and choose the best solution. > > > > I would rather use Saeed's time as a reviewer to my existing and > > current > > patch set. > > Yes, same feeling here, but Saeed brought back his own old > implementation, so maybe he does not feel the same way ?
Agreed, Vladimir's work is more complete than mine, my work was just a RFC to show the concept, it was far from being ready or testable with some use cases such as bonding/bridge/ovs/etc... Let me take a look at the current series, and if I see that the rcu/dev_hold approach is more lightweight then i will suggest it to Vladimir and he can make the final decision.
