Visa Hankala <v...@hankala.org> wrote:
> Use three-way comparison for address elements to avoid integer
> wraparound in the result of xfrm_policy_addr_delta().
> 
> This ensures that the search trees are built and traversed correctly
> when the difference between compared address elements is larger
> than INT_MAX.

Please provide an update to tools/testing/selftests/net/xfrm_policy.sh
that shows that this is a problem.

>       switch (family) {
>       case AF_INET:
> -             if (sizeof(long) == 4 && prefixlen == 0)
> -                     return ntohl(a->a4) - ntohl(b->a4);
> -             return (ntohl(a->a4) & ((~0UL << (32 - prefixlen)))) -
> -                    (ntohl(b->a4) & ((~0UL << (32 - prefixlen))));
> +             mask = ~0U << (32 - prefixlen);
> +             ma = ntohl(a->a4) & mask;
> +             mb = ntohl(b->a4) & mask;

This is suspicious.  Is prefixlen == 0 impossible?

If not, then after patch
mask = ~0U << 32;

... and function returns 0.

Reply via email to