The definition of IS_ERR() already applies the unlikely() notation
when checking the error status of the passed pointer. For this
reason there is no need to have the same notation outside of
IS_ERR() itself.

Clean up code by removing redundant notation.

Signed-off-by: Antonio Quartulli <a...@unstable.cc>
---
 drivers/net/vxlan.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/vxlan.c b/drivers/net/vxlan.c
index e1e44d68ac4b..a8ad710629e6 100644
--- a/drivers/net/vxlan.c
+++ b/drivers/net/vxlan.c
@@ -2477,7 +2477,7 @@ static struct dst_entry *vxlan6_get_route(struct 
vxlan_dev *vxlan,
 
        ndst = ipv6_stub->ipv6_dst_lookup_flow(vxlan->net, sock6->sock->sk,
                                               &fl6, NULL);
-       if (unlikely(IS_ERR(ndst))) {
+       if (IS_ERR(ndst)) {
                netdev_dbg(dev, "no route to %pI6\n", daddr);
                return ERR_PTR(-ENETUNREACH);
        }
-- 
2.29.2

Reply via email to