[PATCH net-next 11/11] mptcp: use the variable sk instead of open-coding

[Mat Martineau]

From: Geliang Tang <geliangt...@gmail.com>

Since the local variable sk has been defined, use it instead of
open-coding.

Reviewed-by: Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.bae...@tessares.net>
Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <geliangt...@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martin...@linux.intel.com>
---
 net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c b/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c
index 46da9f8c9cba..5151cfcd6962 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c
+++ b/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c
@@ -313,7 +313,7 @@ static void mptcp_pm_create_subflow_or_signal_addr(struct 
mptcp_sock *msk)
        struct mptcp_pm_addr_entry *local;
        struct pm_nl_pernet *pernet;
 
-       pernet = net_generic(sock_net((struct sock *)msk), pm_nl_pernet_id);
+       pernet = net_generic(sock_net(sk), pm_nl_pernet_id);
 
        pr_debug("local %d:%d signal %d:%d subflows %d:%d\n",
                 msk->pm.local_addr_used, msk->pm.local_addr_max,
@@ -399,7 +399,7 @@ void mptcp_pm_nl_add_addr_received(struct mptcp_sock *msk)
        local.family = remote.family;
 
        spin_unlock_bh(&msk->pm.lock);
-       __mptcp_subflow_connect((struct sock *)msk, &local, &remote);
+       __mptcp_subflow_connect(sk, &local, &remote);
        spin_lock_bh(&msk->pm.lock);
 
        mptcp_pm_announce_addr(msk, &remote, true, use_port);
-- 
2.29.2