On Sat, 21 Apr 2007, Ilpo Järvinen wrote: > F-RTO does not touch SACKED_ACKED bits at all, so there is no > need to recount them in tcp_enter_frto_loss. After removal of > the else branch, the nested ifs can be combined.
Just in case you come across this, please do not apply it! I noticed that even though it seems very innocent change, it will cause S+L when SACK is not in use because sacked_out is not reset. I'll provide updated patch for this later on... -- i.
