On Sun, Nov 29, 2020 at 2:04 AM Michael Chan <michael.c...@broadcom.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 11:39 AM Marc Smith <msmith...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > [17879.279213] bnxt_en 0000:01:09.0 s1p1: TX timeout detected, > > starting reset task! > > [17883.075299] bnxt_en 0000:01:09.0 s1p1: Resp cmpl intr err msg: 0x51 > > [17883.075302] bnxt_en 0000:01:09.0 s1p1: hwrm_ring_free type 1 > > failed. rc:fffffff0 err:0 > > [17886.957100] bnxt_en 0000:01:09.0 s1p1: Resp cmpl intr err msg: 0x51 > > [17886.957103] bnxt_en 0000:01:09.0 s1p1: hwrm_ring_free type 2 > > failed. rc:fffffff0 err:0 > > [17890.843023] bnxt_en 0000:01:09.0 s1p1: Resp cmpl intr err msg: 0x51 > > [17890.843025] bnxt_en 0000:01:09.0 s1p1: hwrm_ring_free type 2 > > failed. rc:fffffff0 err:0 > > These messages could be caused by IRQ issues or firmware issues. It > seems that one IRQ vector that is shared by 1 TX ring (type 1) and 2 > RX rings (type 2) is not getting the interrupt. It caused the > original TX timeout and the interrupt issue persisted during the > recovery to free these rings. > > > firmware-version: 214.0.191.0 > > This firmware is about 2 years old. I'll have someone get back to you > on how to upgrade and what version to upgrade to.
Thanks Michael. After more investigation, I'm not so sure this is a firmware issue; we see these corresponding events on the host (hypervisor): AMD-Vi: Event logged [IO_PAGE_FAULT device=c8:02.0 domain=0x0001 address=0xfffffffdf8050000 flags=0x0008] > > Thanks.