On Fri, May 04, 2007 at 10:10:24AM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote: > On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 04:31:43PM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote: [...] > Should line 2563 be a spin_lock_irqsave instead along with the > appropriate unluck later? IIRC, when you enable lockdep, it will complain about spinlocks used in an invalid context.
Regards, Frederik > > -- > Len Sorensen > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
