On 2020/11/24 16:11, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 12:12:59PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote: >> One liner would be: >> >> * Acceptable for protecting per-CPU resources accessed from BH >> >> We can add: >> >> * Much like in_softirq() - semantics are ambiguous, use carefully. * >> >> >> IIUC we basically want to protect the nc array and counter here: > > Works for me, thanks!
Will add the above comment in v3. Thanks. > . >
