On Mon, 23 Nov 2020 09:31:28 -0500 Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Mon, 23 Nov 2020 13:08:55 +0200 > Leon Romanovsky <l...@kernel.org> wrote: > > > > [ 10.028024] Chain exists of: > > [ 10.028025] console_owner --> target_list_lock --> _xmit_ETHER#2 > > Note, the problem is that we have a location that grabs the xmit_lock while > holding target_list_lock (and possibly console_owner).
Well, it try_locks the xmit_lock. Does lockdep understand try-locks? (not that I condone the shenanigans that are going on here)
