On Tue, 17 Nov 2020 12:54:22 +0000 Tom Parkin wrote: > > > I think the question is more about long term maintainance. Do we want > > > to keep PPP related module self contained, with low maintainance code > > > (the current proposal)? Or are we willing to modernise the > > > infrastructure, add support and maintain PPP features in other modules > > > like flower, tunnel_key, etc.? > > > > Right, it's really not great to see new IOCTLs being added to drivers, > > but the alternative would require easily 50 times more code. > > Jakub, could I quickly poll you on your current gut-feel level of > opposition to the ioctl-based approach? > > Guillaume has given good feedback on the RFC code which I can work > into an actual patch submission, but I don't really want to if you're > totally opposed to the whole idea :-)
I'll merge it if no one else speaks up in opposition.
