From: Martin Schiller
> Sent: 16 November 2020 13:55
> Extended struct x25_neigh and x25_subscrip_struct to configure following
> params through SIOCX25SSUBSCRIP:
> o mode (DTE/DCE)
> o number of channels
> o facilities (packet size, window size)
> o timer T20
>
> Based on this configuration options the following changes/extensions
> where made:
> o DTE/DCE handling to select the next lc (DCE=from bottom / DTE=from
> top)
> o DTE/DCE handling to set correct clear/reset/restart cause
> o take default facilities from neighbour settings
>
...
> +/*
> + * DTE/DCE subscription options.
> + *
> + * As this is missing lots of options, user should expect major
> + * changes of this structure in 2.5.x which might break compatibility.
A little out of date!
> + * The somewhat ugly dimension 200-sizeof() is needed to maintain
> + * backward compatibility.
> + */
> +struct x25_subscrip_struct {
> + char device[200 - ((2 * sizeof(unsigned long)) +
> + sizeof(struct x25_facilities) +
> + (2 * sizeof(unsigned int)))];
> + unsigned int dce;
> + unsigned int lc;
> + struct x25_facilities facilities;
> + unsigned long t20;
> + unsigned long global_facil_mask; /* 0 to disable
> negotiation */
> + unsigned int extended;
> +};
Would it be better to used fixed size integer types to avoid
'compat_32' issues?
It might even be worth adding padding after the existing
32bit layout to align any additional fields at the same offset
in both 64bit and 32bit systems.
I was also wondering if you can use an anonymous structure
member for the actual fields and then use 200 - sizeof (struct foo)
for the pad?
David
-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT,
UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)
