On 11/16/2020 12:26 AM, Jamal Hadi Salim wrote:
> This nagged me:
> What happens if all the frags dont make it out?
> Should you at least return an error code(from tcf_fragment?)
> and get the action err counters incremented?
Thanks, Will do.
>
> cheers,
> jamal
>
> On 2020-11-15 8:05 a.m., wenxu wrote:
>>
>> 在 2020/11/15 2:05, Cong Wang 写道:
>>> On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 9:44 PM <we...@ucloud.cn> wrote:
>>>> diff --git a/net/sched/act_frag.c b/net/sched/act_frag.c
>>>> new file mode 100644
>>>> index 0000000..3a7ab92
>>>> --- /dev/null
>>>> +++ b/net/sched/act_frag.c
>>> It is kinda confusing to see this is a module. It provides some
>>> wrappers and hooks the dev_xmit_queue(), it belongs more to
>>> the core tc code than any modularized code. How about putting
>>> this into net/sched/sch_generic.c?
>>>
>>> Thanks.
>>
>> All the operations in the act_frag are single L3 action.
>>
>> So we put in a single module. to keep it as isolated/contained as possible
>>
>> Maybe put this in a single file is better than a module? Buildin in the tc
>> core code or not.
>>
>> Enable this feature in Kconifg with NET_ACT_FRAG?
>>
>> +config NET_ACT_FRAG
>> + bool "Packet fragmentation"
>> + depends on NET_CLS_ACT
>> + help
>> + Say Y here to allow fragmenting big packets when outputting
>> + with the mirred action.
>> +
>> + If unsure, say N.
>>
>>
>>>
>
>
