On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 11:03:51PM +0800, Wong Vee Khee wrote: > For clause 45 PHY, introduce additional logics in get_phy_c45_ids() to > check if there is at least one valid device ID, return 0 on true, and > -ENODEV otherwise.
So does this mean you have a device which uses c45 and does not have any valid IDs? What device is it? Can it be used via c22? I would like to know more about why this is needed, since it sounds like a workaround for a broken device. Andrew