> On Mon, Nov 9, 2020 at 2:46 PM zhangqilong <zhangqilo...@huawei.com> > wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 9, 2020 at 2:24 PM zhangqilong <zhangqilo...@huawei.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 9, 2020 at 9:05 AM Zhang Qilong > > > > > <zhangqilo...@huawei.com> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > In many case, we need to check return value of > > > > > > pm_runtime_get_sync, but it brings a trouble to the usage > > > > > > counter processing. Many callers forget to decrease the usage > > > > > > counter when it failed. It has been discussed a lot[0][1]. So > > > > > > we add a function to deal with the usage counter for better coding. > > > > > > > > > > > > [0]https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/6/14/88 > > > > > > [1]https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linux-tegra/patch/2020 > > > > > > 0520 > > > > > > 0951 48.10995-1-dinghao....@zju.edu.cn/ > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Zhang Qilong <zhangqilo...@huawei.com> > > > > > > --- > > > > > > include/linux/pm_runtime.h | 32 > > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > > > > 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+) > > > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/include/linux/pm_runtime.h > > > > > > b/include/linux/pm_runtime.h index 4b708f4e8eed..2b0af5b1dffd > > > > > > 100644 > > > > > > --- a/include/linux/pm_runtime.h > > > > > > +++ b/include/linux/pm_runtime.h > > > > > > @@ -386,6 +386,38 @@ static inline int > > > > > > pm_runtime_get_sync(struct device > > > > > *dev) > > > > > > return __pm_runtime_resume(dev, RPM_GET_PUT); } > > > > > > > > > > > > +/** > > > > > > + * gene_pm_runtime_get_sync - Bump up usage counter of a > > > > > > +device and > > > > > resume it. > > > > > > + * @dev: Target device. > > > > > > > > > > The force argument is not documented. > > > > > > > > (1) Good catch, I will add it in next version. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + * > > > > > > + * Increase runtime PM usage counter of @dev first, and carry > > > > > > + out runtime-resume > > > > > > + * of it synchronously. If __pm_runtime_resume return > > > > > > + negative value(device is in > > > > > > + * error state) or return positive value(the runtime of > > > > > > + device is already active) > > > > > > + * with force is true, it need decrease the usage counter of > > > > > > + the device when > > > > > > + * return. > > > > > > + * > > > > > > + * The possible return values of this function is zero or negative > > > > > > value. > > > > > > + * zero: > > > > > > + * - it means success and the status will store the resume > operation > > > > > status > > > > > > + * if needed, the runtime PM usage counter of @dev remains > > > > > incremented. > > > > > > + * negative: > > > > > > + * - it means failure and the runtime PM usage counter of @dev > has > > > > > been > > > > > > + * decreased. > > > > > > + * positive: > > > > > > + * - it means the runtime of the device is already active before > that. > > > If > > > > > > + * caller set force to true, we still need to decrease the > > > > > > usage > > > > > counter. > > > > > > > > > > Why is this needed? > > > > > > > > (2) If caller set force, it means caller will return even the > > > > device has already been active (__pm_runtime_resume return > > > > positive value) after calling gene_pm_runtime_get_sync, we still > > > > need to decrease the > > > usage count. > > > > > > But who needs this? > > > > > > I don't think that it is a good idea to complicate the API this way. > > > > The callers like: > > ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(dev); > > if (ret) { > > ... > > return (xxx); > > } > > Which isn't correct really, is it? > > If ret is greater than 0, the error should not be returned in the first > place, so > you may want the new wrapper to return zero in that case instead.
I get your idea. > > > drivers/spi/spi-img-spfi.c:734 img_spfi_resume() warn: > > pm_runtime_get_sync() also returns 1 on success > > drivers/mfd/arizona-core.c:49 arizona_clk32k_enable() warn: > > pm_runtime_get_sync() also returns 1 on success > > drivers/usb/dwc3/dwc3-pci.c:212 dwc3_pci_resume_work() warn: > > pm_runtime_get_sync() also returns 1 on success > > drivers/input/keyboard/omap4-keypad.c:279 omap4_keypad_probe() warn: > > pm_runtime_get_sync() also returns 1 on success > > drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_dsi.c:839 vc4_dsi_encoder_enable() warn: > > pm_runtime_get_sync() also returns 1 on success > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/mock_gem_device.c:157 mock_gem_device() > > warn: 'pm_runtime_get_sync(&pdev->dev)' returns positive and negative > > drivers/watchdog/rti_wdt.c:230 rti_wdt_probe() warn: > > pm_runtime_get_sync() also returns 1 on success > > drivers/media/platform/exynos4-is/mipi-csis.c:513 s5pcsis_s_stream() > > warn: pm_runtime_get_sync() also returns 1 on success > > drivers/media/platform/mtk-vcodec/mtk_vcodec_dec_pm.c:89 > > mtk_vcodec_dec_pw_on() warn: pm_runtime_get_sync() also returns 1 on > > success > > drivers/media/platform/ti-vpe/cal.c:794 cal_probe() warn: > > pm_runtime_get_sync() also returns 1 on success > > drivers/media/platform/ti-vpe/vpe.c:2478 vpe_runtime_get() warn: > > pm_runtime_get_sync() also returns 1 on success > > drivers/media/i2c/smiapp/smiapp-core.c:1529 smiapp_pm_get_init() warn: > > pm_runtime_get_sync() also returns 1 on success ... > > they need it to simplify the function. > > > > If we only want to simplify like > > ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(dev); > > if (ret < 0) { > > ... > > Return (xxx) > > } > > The parameter force could be removed. > > Which is exactly my point. OK, I re-code it next version. Thanks, Zhang