From: David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 20:12:13 -0700 (PDT)

> In file included from net/rxrpc/rxkad.c:21:
> net/rxrpc/ar-internal.h:803:1: warning: "atomic_dec" redefined
> In file included from include/linux/spinlock.h:326,
>                  from include/linux/module.h:9,
>                  from net/rxrpc/rxkad.c:12:
> include/asm/atomic.h:67:1: warning: this is the location of the previous 
> definition

I'm fixing this as follows, if you want this debugging code
back do it properly, thanks.

commit 411faf5810cdd0e4f5071a3805d8adb49d120a07
Author: David S. Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date:   Thu Apr 26 20:18:17 2007 -0700

    [RXRPC]: Remove bogus atomic_* overrides.
    
    These are done with CPP defines which several platforms
    use for their atomic.h implementation, which floods the
    build with warnings and breaks the build.
    
    Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

diff --git a/net/rxrpc/ar-internal.h b/net/rxrpc/ar-internal.h
index cb1eb49..58aaf89 100644
--- a/net/rxrpc/ar-internal.h
+++ b/net/rxrpc/ar-internal.h
@@ -786,30 +786,6 @@ static inline void rxrpc_purge_queue(struct sk_buff_head 
*list)
                rxrpc_free_skb(skb);
 }
 
-static inline void __rxrpc__atomic_inc(atomic_t *v)
-{
-       CHECK_SLAB_OKAY(v);
-       atomic_inc(v);
-}
-
-#define atomic_inc(v) __rxrpc__atomic_inc((v))
-
-static inline void __rxrpc__atomic_dec(atomic_t *v)
-{
-       CHECK_SLAB_OKAY(v);
-       atomic_dec(v);
-}
-
-#define atomic_dec(v) __rxrpc__atomic_dec((v))
-
-static inline int __rxrpc__atomic_dec_and_test(atomic_t *v)
-{
-       CHECK_SLAB_OKAY(v);
-       return atomic_dec_and_test(v);
-}
-
-#define atomic_dec_and_test(v) __rxrpc__atomic_dec_and_test((v))
-
 static inline void __rxrpc_get_local(struct rxrpc_local *local, const char *f)
 {
        CHECK_SLAB_OKAY(&local->usage);
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to