On 10/31/20 3:23 PM, Petr Machata wrote:
>
> David Ahern <dsah...@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> On 10/30/20 6:29 AM, Petr Machata wrote:
>>> diff --git a/lib/utils.c b/lib/utils.c
>>> index 930877ae0f0d..8deec86ecbcd 100644
>>> --- a/lib/utils.c
>>> +++ b/lib/utils.c
>>> @@ -1763,3 +1763,11 @@ int parse_on_off(const char *msg, const char
>>> *realval, int *p_err)
>>>
>>> return parse_one_of(msg, realval, values_on_off,
>>> ARRAY_SIZE(values_on_off), p_err);
>>> }
>>> +
>>> +void print_on_off_bool(FILE *fp, const char *flag, bool val)
>>> +{
>>> + if (is_json_context())
>>> + print_bool(PRINT_JSON, flag, NULL, val);
>>> + else
>>> + fprintf(fp, "%s %s ", flag, val ? "on" : "off");
>>> +}
>>>
>>
>> I think print_on_off should be fine and aligns with parse_on_off once it
>> returns a bool.
>
> print_on_off() is already used in the RDMA tool, and actually outputs
> "on" and "off", unlike this. So I chose this instead.
>
> I could rename the RDMA one though -- it's used in two places, whereas
> this is used in about two dozen instances across the codebase.
>
yes, the rdma utils are using generic function names. The rdma version
should be renamed; perhaps rd_print_on_off. That seems to be once common
prefix. Added Leon.
