On Thu, 29 Oct 2020 02:12:21 +0800 DENG Qingfang wrote:
> MT7530/7531 has a global RX packet length register, which can be used
> to set MTU.
> 
> Signed-off-by: DENG Qingfang <dqf...@gmail.com>

Please wrap your code at 80 chars.

> diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/mt7530.c b/drivers/net/dsa/mt7530.c
> index de7692b763d8..7764c66a47c9 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/dsa/mt7530.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/mt7530.c
> @@ -1021,6 +1021,40 @@ mt7530_port_disable(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port)
>       mutex_unlock(&priv->reg_mutex);
>  }
>  
> +static int
> +mt7530_port_change_mtu(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port, int new_mtu)
> +{
> +     struct mt7530_priv *priv = ds->priv;
> +     int length;
> +
> +     /* When a new MTU is set, DSA always set the CPU port's MTU to the 
> largest MTU
> +      * of the slave ports. Because the switch only has a global RX length 
> register,
> +      * only allowing CPU port here is enough.
> +      */
> +     if (!dsa_is_cpu_port(ds, port))
> +             return 0;
> +
> +     /* RX length also includes Ethernet header, MTK tag, and FCS length */
> +     length = new_mtu + ETH_HLEN + MTK_HDR_LEN + ETH_FCS_LEN;
> +     if (length <= 1522)
> +             mt7530_rmw(priv, MT7530_GMACCR, MAX_RX_PKT_LEN_MASK, 
> MAX_RX_PKT_LEN_1522);
> +     else if (length <= 1536)
> +             mt7530_rmw(priv, MT7530_GMACCR, MAX_RX_PKT_LEN_MASK, 
> MAX_RX_PKT_LEN_1536);
> +     else if (length <= 1552)
> +             mt7530_rmw(priv, MT7530_GMACCR, MAX_RX_PKT_LEN_MASK, 
> MAX_RX_PKT_LEN_1552);
> +     else
> +             mt7530_rmw(priv, MT7530_GMACCR, MAX_RX_JUMBO_MASK | 
> MAX_RX_PKT_LEN_MASK,
> +                     MAX_RX_JUMBO(DIV_ROUND_UP(length, 1024)) | 
> MAX_RX_PKT_LEN_JUMBO);

this line should start under priv, so it aligns to the opening
parenthesis.

Besides, don't you need to reset the JUMBO bit when going from jumbo to
non-jumbo? The mask should always include jumbo.

I assume you're duplicating the mt7530_rmw() for the benefit of the
constant validation, but it seems to be counterproductive here.

> +     return 0;
> +}

Reply via email to