From: Andrew Lunn
> Sent: 29 October 2020 14:31
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 02:19:27PM +0000, David Laight wrote:
> > From: Andrew Lunn
> > > Sent: 28 October 2020 00:23
> > >
> > > net/rose/af_rose.c: In function ‘rose_info_show’:
> > > net/rose/af_rose.c:1413:20: warning: trigraph ??- ignored, use -trigraphs
> > > to enable [-Wtrigraphs]
> > > 1413 | callsign = "??????-?";
> > >
> > > ??- is a trigraph, and should be replaced by a ˜ by the
> > > compiler. However, trigraphs are being ignored in the build. Fix the
> > > warning by escaping the ?? prefix of a trigraph.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Andrew Lunn <and...@lunn.ch>
> > > ---
> > > net/rose/af_rose.c | 2 +-
> > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/net/rose/af_rose.c b/net/rose/af_rose.c
> > > index cf7d974e0f61..2c297834d268 100644
> > > --- a/net/rose/af_rose.c
> > > +++ b/net/rose/af_rose.c
> > > @@ -1410,7 +1410,7 @@ static int rose_info_show(struct seq_file *seq,
> > > void *v)
> > > ax2asc(buf, &rose->dest_call));
> > >
> > > if (ax25cmp(&rose->source_call, &null_ax25_address) == 0)
> > > - callsign = "??????-?";
> > > + callsign = "????\?\?-?";
> >
> > I think I'd just split the string, eg: "?????" "-?".
>
> Humm. I think we need a language lawyer.
>
> Does it concatenate the strings and then evaluate for trigraphs? Or
> does it evaluate for trigraphs, and then concatenate the strings?
I'm 99.9999% sure trigraphs are evaluated before string concatenation.
Although trigraphs are such a stupid idea I'd be tempted to just
turn the warning off.
There is good reason why they are ignored by default.
David
-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT,
UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)
