On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 8:31 AM Aleksandr Nogikh <nog...@google.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 7:57 PM Willem de Bruijn > <willemdebruijn.ker...@gmail.com> wrote: > [...] > > If the handle does not need to be set if zero, why then set it if the > > skb has extensions? > > The point of that condition is to avoid unnecessary allocations of skb > extension > objects. At the same time, one would expect skb_get_kcov_handle to return the > latest value that was set via skb_set_kcov_handle. So if a buffer already has > a > non-zero kcov_handle and skb_set_kcov_handle is called to set it to zero, it > should be set to zero.
I see. I thought it was some best effort approach: if there happens to be space, use it, but don't allocate. Which I did not understand. Could you rephrase the comment to make more clear that this is about clearing a possibly previously set value. > > skb_ext_add and skb_ext_find are not defined unless CONFIG_SKB_EXTENSIONS. > > > > Perhaps CONFIG_KCOV should be made to select that? > > Yes, thank you for pointing it out. I’ll fix it in the next version.
