On Mon 26 Oct 2020 at 19:12, Jamal Hadi Salim <j...@mojatatu.com> wrote: > On 2020-10-26 7:28 a.m., Vlad Buslov wrote: >> >> On Sat 24 Oct 2020 at 20:40, Jamal Hadi Salim <j...@mojatatu.com> wrote: > > [..] >>>> >>>> Yes, that makes sense. I guess introducing something like 'tc action -br >>>> ls ..' mode implemented by means of existing terse flag + new 'also >>>> output action index' flag would achieve that goal. >>>> >>> >>> Right. There should be no interest in the cookie here at all. Maybe >>> it could be optional with a flag indication. >>> Have time to cook a patch? I'll taste/test it. >> >> Patch to make cookie in filter terse dump optional? That would break >> existing terse dump users that rely on it (OVS). > > Meant patch for 'tc action -br ls' > > Which by default would not include the cookie.
So action-dump-specific flag that causes act api to output action index (via new attribute) and skips cookie? > > cheers, > jamal
