On Sun, 18 Oct 2020 18:38:59 +0200 Heiner Kallweit wrote:
> For several network drivers it was reported that using
> __napi_schedule_irqoff() is unsafe with forced threading. One way to
> fix this is switching back to __napi_schedule, but then we lose the
> benefit of the irqoff version in general. As stated by Eric it doesn't
> make sense to make the minimal hard irq handlers in drivers using NAPI
> a thread. Therefore ensure that the hard irq handler is never
> thread-ified.
> 
> Fixes: 9a899a35b0d6 ("r8169: switch to napi_schedule_irqoff")
> Link: https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/10/18/19
> Signed-off-by: Heiner Kallweit <hkallwe...@gmail.com>

Applied, thank you!

Reply via email to