On Sun, 18 Oct 2020 18:38:59 +0200 Heiner Kallweit wrote: > For several network drivers it was reported that using > __napi_schedule_irqoff() is unsafe with forced threading. One way to > fix this is switching back to __napi_schedule, but then we lose the > benefit of the irqoff version in general. As stated by Eric it doesn't > make sense to make the minimal hard irq handlers in drivers using NAPI > a thread. Therefore ensure that the hard irq handler is never > thread-ified. > > Fixes: 9a899a35b0d6 ("r8169: switch to napi_schedule_irqoff") > Link: https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/10/18/19 > Signed-off-by: Heiner Kallweit <hkallwe...@gmail.com>
Applied, thank you!