Hello.

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Wed, 25 Apr 2007 12:35:49 +1000), Herbert Xu 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:

> This makes no sense.  Why should we include all these proc operations
> when PROC_FS is turned off? How about this as a fix (on top of the
> above patch):
> 
> [IPV4]: Move snmp_mib_init out of proc.c
> 
> The function snmp_mib_init has nothing to do with proc so this patch
> moves it out of proc.c and to the only place that uses it.  Right now
> there is only one user so I'ved made it static too.

Herbert, as I said before, we could defer that.
It was preparation for future development (per-interface statistics
and netlink interface.
(I would say, proc.c should be snmp.c.)

Regards,

--yoshfuji
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to