On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 01:34:55PM +0200, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
> I'm aware of the topic, but missing the benefits of the irqoff version
> unconditionally doesn't seem to be the best option.

What are the benefits of the irqoff version? As far as I see it, the
only use case for that function is when the caller has _explicitly_
disabled interrupts.

The plain napi_schedule call will check if irqs are disabled. If they
are, it won't do anything further in that area. There is no performance
impact except for a check.

> Needed is a function that dynamically picks the right version.

So you want to replace a check with another check, am I right? How will
that improve anything performance-wise?

Reply via email to