On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 4:17 PM Cong Wang <xiyou.wangc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Note, there are some other suspicious use of dev->hard_header_len in
> the same file, but let's leave them to a separate patch if really
> needed.

I looked at the file (before this patch). There are 4 occurrences of
hard_header_len, but they are all for ERSPAN devices (TAP devices
which tunnel Ethernet frames). So I think they are used for the
Ethernet header length and we don't need to worry about them.

Reply via email to