On 11 October 2020 12:37:29 CEST, Andrey Konovalov <andreyk...@google.com> wrote: >I initially hesitated to do that, as it would multiply the number of >kcov callbacks. But perhaps you're right and a clean API look >outweighs the rest. I will do this in v3. Yeah, OK, dunno. You can always make it an inline calling the "full" API so after compiling it's equivalent. But if course that still has the two APIs. It just seemed to the common case wouldn't worry really (have to) about these things, especially if you plan on changing it again later. johannes -- Sent from my phone.
- [PATCH v2 0/3] [PATCH v2 0/3] [PATCH v2 0/3] net, mac8021... Aleksandr Nogikh
- [PATCH v2 2/3] net: store KCOV remote handle in sk_b... Aleksandr Nogikh
- [PATCH v2 1/3] kernel: make kcov_common_handle consi... Aleksandr Nogikh
- [PATCH v2 3/3] mac80211: add KCOV remote annotations... Aleksandr Nogikh
- Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] [PATCH v2 0/3] [PATCH v2 0/3] net... Johannes Berg
- Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] [PATCH v2 0/3] [PATCH v2 0/3]... Johannes Berg
- Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] [PATCH v2 0/3] [PATCH v2 0/3] net... Johannes Berg
- Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] [PATCH v2 0/3] [PATCH v2 0/3]... Aleksandr Nogikh
- Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] [PATCH v2 0/3] [PATCH v2 ... Johannes Berg
