On Thu, Oct 01, 2020 at 07:42:12PM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> When a DSA switch driver needs to call dsa_untag_bridge_pvid(), it can
> set dsa_switch::untag_brige_pvid to indicate this is necessary.
> 
> This is a pre-requisite to making sure that we are always calling
> dsa_untag_bridge_pvid() after eth_type_trans() has been called.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.faine...@gmail.com>
> ---

Reviewed-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.olt...@nxp.com>

>  include/net/dsa.h | 8 ++++++++
>  net/dsa/dsa.c     | 9 +++++++++
>  2 files changed, 17 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/include/net/dsa.h b/include/net/dsa.h
> index b502a63d196e..8b0696e08cac 100644
> --- a/include/net/dsa.h
> +++ b/include/net/dsa.h
> @@ -308,6 +308,14 @@ struct dsa_switch {
>        */
>       bool                    configure_vlan_while_not_filtering;
>  
> +     /* If the switch driver always programs the CPU port as egress tagged
> +      * despite the VLAN configuration indicating otherwise, then setting
> +      * @untag_bridge_pvid will force the DSA receive path to pop the 
> bridge's
> +      * default_pvid VLAN tagged frames to offer a consistent behavior
> +      * between a vlan_filtering=0 and vlan_filtering=1 bridge device.
> +      */
> +     bool                    untag_bridge_pvid;
> +
>       /* In case vlan_filtering_is_global is set, the VLAN awareness state
>        * should be retrieved from here and not from the per-port settings.
>        */
> diff --git a/net/dsa/dsa.c b/net/dsa/dsa.c
> index 5c18c0214aac..dec4ab59b7c4 100644
> --- a/net/dsa/dsa.c
> +++ b/net/dsa/dsa.c
> @@ -225,6 +225,15 @@ static int dsa_switch_rcv(struct sk_buff *skb, struct 
> net_device *dev,
>       skb->pkt_type = PACKET_HOST;
>       skb->protocol = eth_type_trans(skb, skb->dev);
>  
> +     if (unlikely(cpu_dp->ds->untag_bridge_pvid)) {
> +             nskb = dsa_untag_bridge_pvid(skb);
> +             if (!nskb) {
> +                     kfree_skb(skb);
> +                     return 0;
> +             }
> +             skb = nskb;
> +     }
> +
>       s = this_cpu_ptr(p->stats64);
>       u64_stats_update_begin(&s->syncp);
>       s->rx_packets++;
> -- 
> 2.25.1
> 

Reply via email to