The 09/23/2020 20:22, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the 
> content is safe
> 
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 10:08:00PM +0200, Horatiu Vultur wrote:
> > The 09/23/2020 14:24, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> > > +               if (ocelot_port->ptp_cmd == IFH_REW_OP_TWO_STEP_PTP) {
> > > +                       struct sk_buff *clone;
> > > +
> > > +                       clone = skb_clone_sk(skb);
> > > +                       if (!clone) {
> > > +                               kfree_skb(skb);
> > > +                               return NETDEV_TX_OK;
> >
> > Why do you return NETDEV_TX_OK?
> > Because the frame is not sent yet.
> 
> I suppose I _could_ increment the tx_dropped counters, if that's what
> you mean.

Yeah, something like that I was thinking.

Also I am just thinking, not sure if it is correct but, can you return
NETDEV_TX_BUSY and not free the skb?

> 
> I was also going to request David to let me send a v2, because I want to
> replace the kfree_skb at the end of this function with a proper
> consume_skb, so that this won't appear as a false positive in the drop
> monitor.
> 
> Thanks,
> -Vladimir

-- 
/Horatiu

Reply via email to