On 9/9/2020 11:34 AM, Florian Fainelli wrote:


On 9/9/2020 10:53 AM, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
On Wed, Sep 09, 2020 at 10:22:42AM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
How do you make sure that the CPU port sees the frame untagged which would
be necessary for a VLAN-unaware bridge? Do you have a special remapping
rule?

No, I don't have any remapping rules that would be relevant here.
Why would the frames need to be necessarily untagged for a VLAN-unaware
bridge, why is it a problem if they aren't?

bool br_allowed_ingress(const struct net_bridge *br,
            struct net_bridge_vlan_group *vg, struct sk_buff *skb,
            u16 *vid, u8 *state)
{
    /* If VLAN filtering is disabled on the bridge, all packets are
     * permitted.
     */
    if (!br_opt_get(br, BROPT_VLAN_ENABLED)) {
        BR_INPUT_SKB_CB(skb)->vlan_filtered = false;
        return true;
    }

    return __allowed_ingress(br, vg, skb, vid, state);
}

If I have a VLAN on a bridged switch port where the bridge is not
filtering, I have an 8021q upper of the bridge with that VLAN ID.

Yes that is the key right there, you need an 8021q upper to pop the VLAN ID or push it, that is another thing that users need to be aware of which is a bit awkward, most expect things to just work. Maybe we should just refuse to have bridge devices that are not VLAN-aware, because this is just too cumbersome to deal with.

With the drivers that you currently maintain and with the CPU port being always tagged in the VLANs added to the user-facing ports, when you are using a non-VLAN aware bridge, do you systematically add an br0.1 upper 802.1Q device to pop/push the VLAN tag?

I am about ready to submit the changes we discussed to b53, but I am still a bit uncomfortable with this part of the change because it will make the CPU port follow the untagged attribute of an user-facing port.

@@ -1444,7 +1427,7 @@ void b53_vlan_add(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port,
                        untagged = true;

                vl->members |= BIT(port);
-               if (untagged && !dsa_is_cpu_port(ds, port))
+               if (untagged)
                        vl->untag |= BIT(port);
                else
                        vl->untag &= ~BIT(port);
@@ -1482,7 +1465,7 @@ int b53_vlan_del(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port,
                if (pvid == vid)
                        pvid = b53_default_pvid(dev);

-               if (untagged && !dsa_is_cpu_port(ds, port))
+               if (untagged)
                        vl->untag &= ~(BIT(port));

--
Florian

Reply via email to