On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 5:00 PM Vadym Kochan <vadym.koc...@plvision.eu> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 12:38:04PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 8, 2020 at 11:35 AM Vadym Kochan <vadym.koc...@plvision.eu>
> > wrote:
> > > On Fri, Sep 04, 2020 at 10:12:07PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Sep 4, 2020 at 7:52 PM Vadym Kochan <vadym.koc...@plvision.eu>
> > > > wrote:
...
> > > > > + if (b == 0)
> > > > > + continue;
> > > > > +
> > > > > + prestera_sdma_rx_desc_set_next(sdma,
> > > > > + ring->bufs[b -
> > > > > 1].desc,
> > > > > + buf->desc_dma);
> > > > > +
> > > > > + if (b == PRESTERA_SDMA_RX_DESC_PER_Q - 1)
> > > > > + prestera_sdma_rx_desc_set_next(sdma,
> > > > > buf->desc,
> > > > > +
> > > > > head->desc_dma);
> > > >
> > > > I guess knowing what the allowed range of bnum the above can be
> > > > optimized.
> > > >
> > > You mean to replace PRESTERA_SDMA_RX_DESC_PER_Q by bnum ?
> >
> > I don't know what you meant in above. It might be a bug, it might be
> > that bnum is redundant and this definition may be used everywhere...
> > But I believe there is room for improvement when I see pattern like
> >
> > for (i < X) {
> > ...
> > if (i == 0) {
> > ...
> > } else if (i == X - 1) {
> > ...
> > }
> > }
> >
> > Either it can be while-loop (or do-while) with better semantics for
> > the first and last item to handle or something else.
> > Example from another review [1] in case you wonder how changes can be
> > made. Just think about it.
> >
> > [1]: https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-pci/msg60826.html (before)
> > https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-pci/msg62043.html (after)
> >
>
> I came up with the following approach which works:
>
> -------------->8------------------------------------------------
> tail = &ring->bufs[bnum - 1];
> head = &ring->bufs[0];
> next = head;
> prev = next;
> ring->next_rx = 0;
>
> do {
> err = prestera_sdma_buf_init(sdma, next);
> if (err)
> return err;
>
> err = prestera_sdma_rx_skb_alloc(sdma, next);
> if (err)
> return err;
>
> prestera_sdma_rx_desc_init(sdma, next->desc, next->buf_dma);
>
> prestera_sdma_rx_desc_set_next(sdma, prev->desc, next->desc_dma);
>
> prev = next;
> next++;
> } while (prev != tail);
>
> /* make a circular list */
> prestera_sdma_rx_desc_set_next(sdma, tail->desc, head->desc_dma);
> --------------8<------------------------------------------------
>
> Now it looks more list-oriented cyclic logic.
And much better, thanks!
Note, you have two places in the code with something similar (I mean
loop handling), perhaps you may improve both.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
